![]() ![]() The 9th Circuit determined that Apple was in violation of antitrust laws because it harmed Epic’s sales by not allowing app developers to direct consumers to the Epic Games Store, which offered reduced prices and a lower commission compared to that in Apple’s App Store. The 9th Circuit ruled that Epic “had standing to seek injunctive relief against that provision pursuant to California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The law requires the plaintiff to show they have “suffered an injury in fact that is concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent,” according to the case filing. These Are the Best Desktop Apps for Gmailĩ of the Best Flops on Display at the Museum of Failureįrom Disney+ to Max, Here Are the Best Streaming ServicesĮpic requested to lift the 9th Circuit’s decision to delay the injunction but was denied in what may be a major setback for the video game developer. Circuit Court of Appeals criticized Apple’s arguments, saying they “may not be technically frivolous” but don’t acknowledge the rulings and factual records represented in the case, Reuters reported. The Appeals Court told Apple it had 90 days to file a petition and pause on the Supreme Court’s ruling last month, even as the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. ![]() District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled against Epic’s antitrust claims but found instead that Apple had violated California’s unfair competition law. Epic is fighting to be able to establish its own app store and circumvent the so-called “App Store tax.” U.S. Apple takes a 30% cut of any App Store or in-app purchases. A judge dismissed the antitrust claims in 2021 but ruled that Apple could not prevent developers from “steering” customers to links to make purchases because of California anti-competitive laws. Epic Games, the owner of the popular video game “Fortnite,” filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple in 2020 accusing the company of holding a monopoly over apps by requiring consumers to purchase through its app store. Supreme Court denied Epic Games’ appeal against Apple on Wednesday, which would have required the iPhone maker change its App Store’s payment options. Checkmarks made this much more difficult, with users able to differentiate trolls from the figures they were impersonating.The U.S. Famously, the checkmark was introduced to protect Twitter, not the celebs, after baseball player Tony La Russa sued the platform over other users impersonating him. Simply Googling "why was Twitter verification introduced?" will also show that Sweeney has missed out an important part of Twitter's history. "It was doled out to friends of employees without identity verification or noteworthiness, and it was revoked as punishment for speech." It's worth noting that a community note has been left on his thread, making it clear that users did have to verify their identity with the old system. He goes on to say that the old days of Twitter, before verification was introduced, was a "meritocracy", where likes and retweets ensued to "the best rose to the top." Then, he says checkmarks "broke the meritocracy with a policy deeming verification only for elite 'noteworthy' users." "They're the cool kids from junior high who worked to exclude we nerds from cool kid events, plus the losers who joined in to gain cred." As the name suggests, this encourages users to go through the verified tab and block anyone who has paid for Twitter Blue, making their attempt to boost their accounts fruitless.Sweeney, however, with his $11 checkmark in hand, didn't find this particularly amusing."People in this #BlockTheBlue pressure campaign are losers and goons," says Sweeney. Related: Cult Of The Lamb Interview - How To Start Your Own (Twitter) Cult With One Adorable MascotIt all started when unverified users started the #BlockTheBlue campaign. ![]() But perhaps most heartbreaking for Musk, his precious Twitter Blue subscribers are getting made fun of, including Epic Games CEO, Tim Sweeney. But we'll touch on that later.Of course, this has led to celebrities leaving the platform, such as Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsey, and other users impersonating brands and high-profile figures. Some celebs were given one for free, for some reason. Yep, he finally got rid of all legacy checkmarks, meaning that anyone with a tick next to their name has paid for Twitter Blue. After weeks of relative calm, Elon Musk has clumsily introduced yet another sweeping change to Twitter, causing a whole host of problems many of us saw coming a mile away. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |